Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year

To: "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year
From: Jeff <jrnet@centurylink.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 12:17:37 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I agree with you Lee.

My new rotatable flag to me is super compared to my 4' loop
on my 1/4 acre city lot.

I guess it's all relative to one's situation.

Maybe the word Nick is looking for is Magic.

There is no Magic antenna that is effective when the band is not open.

Jeff Reynolds
NE0DX

Lee STRAHAN wrote:
Hmmm, Nick,
   I beg to differ with you. I don’t care about scores or countries, zones  
worked but I do care about 160 meter receiving antennas.
In my opinion your statement is dead wrong.
Not looking for a war of words or any more discussion. I will not respond again 
about this.

Lee   K7TJR
Hi-Z Antennas



-----Original Message-----
From: Topband <topband-bounces+k7tjr=msn.com@contesting.com> On Behalf Of uy0zg
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 7:10 AM
To: peter.voelpel@t-online.de
Cc: topband@contesting.com; Topband 
<topband-bounces+uy0zg=mksat.net@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year

Dr Peter

Super RX antennas for 160 m do not exist!

Exist  :
- good conditions
- Quiet countryside
-  Geography

Does not exist :

- Miracles

____________________________

I never envy. They envy me!




In CQ WW I only heard three from the USA - K7GM, W1KM, W3UA.

These are honest QSOs.



---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua

dj7ww@t-online.de писал 2020-12-01 16:38:
It´s amazing, the probably envious stations always suspect others with
their better antennas and perhaps better operation to use web sdr.

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband
[mailto:topband-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de@contesting.com]
On
Behalf Of uy0zg
Sent: Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2020 14:19
To: Tom | SP5XO
Cc: topband@contesting.com; Topband
Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year

Hi

   Weeks conditions ?

For the best of the ex USSR countries, this is not a problem!


Very good HIGH + WEB SDR+ very kind and democratic American judges  =


super result is ready!

http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2020-11/msg08693.html


.........

73 !

---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua

Tom | SP5XO ????? 2020-12-01 14:21:
Compare to recent weeks conditions were marginal during CQWW. Only
two Zone
4 stations were audible here and it took long time to work them.
Whereas a
week ago band was wide open from MI, IL to CO or even down to TX.
I worked only mults and Dx's this time. Only 13 stations from Zone 5
in my log. Except for VY2ZM all NA's were weak including KC1XX and
W3LPL!
Hopeful things improve for next weekend and will work some more in
ARRL 160.
CU
Tom
sp5xo

Conditions certainly didn't favor 160 over the weekend CQWW contest
here in
Florida at least.

Looking back in 2019 I worked 50 countries on 160 during CQWW, this
year it was only 17, only 3 Europeans and those were very weak. I'm
sure the lack of expeditions due to CV-19 played a part but on whole
I think many guys in hindsight will be glad they didn't spend the
money to go.

Maybe things will pick up next weekend for the ARRL 160 test though
that tends to be largely a USA to USA test and it is hard to hear
the DX through the local mob

CU guys in the pile up

Dave
NR1DX
--
Dave Manuals@ArtekManuals.com www.ArtekManuals.com



_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector



_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>