On Thu,2/26/2015 7:29 AM, kolson@rcn.com wrote:
Sometimes it's more in how things are presented. The thing that struck me was
how the ARRL looked at it was some kind of triumphant feat when it struck me
as, ultimately, kind of sad.
Have you ever visited a multi-transmitter contesting station? Do you
have any idea of the engineering it took to build it and make it
competitive? We're talking antenna system design, careful engineering
and filtering to allow multiple transmitters at high power to not
interfere with others at the same QTH, power distribution for those
transmitters, an acoustic operating environment that permits all those
guys to be running SSB in the same room without going nuts?
Do you have any idea of the systems engineering needed to remote a
single station? I'm an EE, designed complex audio systems in my
professional life. I've looked at what it would take to remote my
station and quickly decided that it was WAY too much work. Heck -- it
takes much of my time keeping my station running for me to sit in front
of. Among other things, you've got to goof-proof the control systems so
that you don't fry your gear (and Mr. Rodman described). Multiply that
by 5 or 6 stations, and that's a very serious accomplishment. THAT is
ham radio.
Sitting in front of a radio that you bought, set on a table, and hooked
up to an antenna that you bought with pre-made cables that you bought is
a lot closer to CB than ham radio.
73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|