Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Brave New World

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Brave New World
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:31:53 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
CW is much more popular since the FCC removed the requirement for code.....Think about that for a minute. People have are trying and using CW much more now that it is not forced on them. Ham Radio did not die that day. The bands are not filled with anymore LIDS than they were before that day.

The no code license has also allowed a huge number of people to work in their local communities interfacing with their local emergency services departments, Red Cross, hospitals etc. Most of these people we hardly hear about.

A remote contact requires radio and rf and both ends of the contact. My remote, which I don't have tells my transmitter to xmit then I receive. The station on the other end is also using RF.

Remote radio is simply an extension of the mic cord, keyer cord and headphones.

We are not talking about working people on the internet without RF such as chat rooms.

Everything was always better in the old days right? I don't think so. Maybe for some of you guys that are 20 years older than me. Interfacing with computers, remote operation, the amazing work of weak signal processing, SteppIR antennas, 8 element circle shortened rcv arrays and rtty and cw decoding and spotting are very interesting to me. They keep me interested in the hobby.

I enjoy chasing new ones and breaking pileups. People demand new things to work so people have to dream up new "countries" ie sand bars and rocks that require scaffolding to operate from to keep the people happy. We have created a bunch of rules to allow unihabited locations such as BS7, KP1, KP5 and many more to become "countries".

You don't like remote operation. I don't like creating countries that don't really exist just so I have another new one to work.

Mike W0MU

On 2/26/2015 8:29 AM, kolson@rcn.com wrote:
Sometimes it's more in how things are presented. The thing that struck me was 
how the ARRL looked at it was some kind of triumphant feat when it struck me 
as, ultimately, kind of sad.

It was late in 2006 when it c ame out that the FCC would remove  the CW requirement  for 
HF operation in early 2007 . Actua lly, I had expected it to happen, figured it was 
inevitable and had come to grips. But the President of our local Radio club anounced it 
on the reflector to the membership with the message title "A Chris tmas gift to 
all". Mostly I am a laid-back guy, but somehow this made me see red. Why?

Back in the day, when a fellow ham would screw up, we would kid him with "where'd you get your license, out of a Cracker 
Jack Box?" (or if you are Firesignian in nature, a Cracker Back Jox) Well, in this case, at least the guy would have had to 
buy the box of Cracker Jack! It was the idea that a HF  Amateur Radio license should be a "gift" that stuck in my craw. 
This also became tinged with sadness as I realized that the "powers that be" had come to the (probably correct) 
conclusion that people would no longer see an Amateur Radio lic ense as being worth putting in some effort  for and would only 
deign to be licensed if it was all but  "given" to them. BTW, this is not intended as a "you kids get off my 
lawn" kind of rant, just a statement on how it is.

Ham radio will go on, but the glory days as we knew them are pretty much the province of 
us veteran hams . That shouldn't stop us from enjoying it as we have been doing or 
welcoming the new hams that "get" what we do. I just doubt that all that many 
future hams will look at ham radio  as  we do. They will find their own ways and 
interests, but the  romance of putting together their own  station to work some far away 
island through the noise on top band will probably (and, I guess,  understandingly) elude 
them  in a time where you can walk down the street talking to your buddy in Australia on 
your smart phone, rent a few minutes  on a remote superstation to work the latest 
Dxpedition, or operate from a big multi-multi contest station without leaving your 
apartment.

Best, Kevin

----- Original Message -----

From: "Eddy Swynar" <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 4:05:09 PM
Subject: Topband: Brave New World

Hi Guys,

I am really & truly surprised that nobody here has raised so much as even an 
eyebrow at this story:

http://www.arrl.org/news/no-one-in-the-shack-as-station-logs-4200-contacts-in-arrl-dx-cw-contest

The whole notion---to me, at any rate---compromises the very essence & the "...joie de 
vivre!" of operating on 160-meters, don't you think...? And to imagine that one of the 
"perpetrators" in all this is actually exuberant about his accomplishment...

“...'No one was in the K4VV shack for the entire contest!' said Mike L*, W0**, who 
took part in the contest via K4** from his own shack in Virginia..."

This too is "progress"...? Oh well, I guess maybe it is. Time marches on, things evolve, 
things "de-evolve," & nothing stays quite the same.

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>