To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" and losses |
From: | "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com> |
Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:27:38 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Of interest here is that the benchmark Brown, Lewis and Epstein I.R.E paper on ground systems does not show such standing waves along buried radials (clip below). Of interest down here is surface-buried radials down here show definite standing waves in actual measurements, so it doesn't care what BL and E measured. What they measured in different dirt on a different frequency won't change how the radials acted here. This is the problem with radials and models. The dirt isn't the same and the radials are never the same effective depth all over the world. 73 Tom _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" and losses, Richard Fry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" and losses, shristov |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" and losses, Richard Fry |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground" and losses, shristov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |