Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Elimination of Treadmill RFI on 160 meters

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Elimination of Treadmill RFI on 160 meters
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:16:32 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
This snide remark ignores the fact that it is generally not practical (nor is it good politics) to go inside your neighbor's equipment to add bypass capacitors. Nor is it practical to open up a wall wart, nor even most consumer equipment. It also ignores the fact that much of RFI at HF is common mode, not differential mode, caused by bonding failures (the Pin One Problem and its power systems equivalent). And it ignores the fact that it is often the cable shield or the power system equipment ground that is carrying the RF noise current, for reasons noted in my earlier post.

It isn't a snide remark, it is how we focus on chokes.

Any filtering or decoupling system works by the ratio of series impedance to shunt impedances.

A series choke is useless unless there is some value of shunt impedance in the system. As a matter of fact, lack of established shunt impedances is what can drive choke requirements to unrealistic values. This is true in baluns, just like it is in line filters.

Most outlet strips and devices have room inside for several UL/CSA/ VDE approved bypass capacitors. Rather than paying $30 or much more for some capacitors in a physically large filter can, with minimal choke impedance inside, one might consider a few well-spent dollars for external components.

Many times RFI is cured simply by bypassing and closing a loop through a device, where choke requirements alone would be astronomical or ineffective.

73 Tom



_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>