Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 1000 feet 5/8" hardline or 600ohm True Ladder line.

To: "Mike Waters" <mikewate@gmail.com>, "topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 1000 feet 5/8" hardline or 600ohm True Ladder line.
From: "k1fz" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 23:47:05 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>

A calibrated dummy load wattmeter at the far end of the cable can be a real eye opener. Power loss distributed 1000 feet would not result in much warming.

73
Bruce-K1FZ
www.qsl.net/k1fz/pennantnotes.html




----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Waters" <mikewate@gmail.com>
To: "topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: 1000 feet 5/8" hardline or 600ohm True Ladder line.


You're right about the loss being all in the copper center conductor, Jim.

I based that statement on a graph that Owen Duffy had on the old
vk1od.netsite for solid center conductor. Perhaps I looked at it
wrong, but I don't
think so.

There were two charts, one for loss and the other for power handling
capability. Maybe I have them confused.

However, I did look at Commscope's data sheet. I forget all the details,
but their loss specs at MF looked really good.

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>wrote:

On 4/26/2014 6:17 PM, Mike Waters wrote:

The loss of RG-6 is about the same as RG-213.


Only in an advertising brochure for the RG-6. On 160M, loss is all due to
copper, and there's  LOT more copper in RG213 than in any RG6 cables I've
seen.

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>