To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? |
From: | Augie Hansen <augie.hansen@comcast.net> |
Date: | Sun, 08 Sep 2013 13:54:04 -0600 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 9/8/2013 1:08 PM, Charlie Cunningham wrote: ... I didn't have time to get back to it today because I got all bolluxed up trying to include an attachment to my reflector post. Also, even trying to embed the document in the body of a reflector post didn't seem to work. Must have made the posting too large for the reflector to accept. Charlie,The reflectors don't allow attachments and binary formatted documents. These message components are fertile ground for computer attacks. Convert your Word doc to a plain text file and insert it into the body of your message. Should be golden. Gus Hansen KB0YH _________________ Topband Reflector |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, James Rodenkirch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Charlie Cunningham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Charlie Cunningham |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Charlie Cunningham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |