| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions?? |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:45:46 -0700 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 9/8/2013 10:37 AM, Charlie Cunningham wrote: Well it seems that somehow the document attachment got removed. I'll try again! This reflector does not accept attachments. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Tom W8JI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, Charlie Cunningham |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, Charlie Cunningham |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, Charlie Cunningham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |