| To: | <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>, <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions?? |
| From: | "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 8 Sep 2013 13:55:33 -0400 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
So, I see, Jim I even tried just copying the word document into the body of an e-mail but apparently that didn't work either? I'll give that another try. Charlie -----Original Message----- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 1:46 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions?? On 9/8/2013 10:37 AM, Charlie Cunningham wrote: > Well it seems that somehow the document attachment got removed. I'll try > again! This reflector does not accept attachments. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector _________________ Topband Reflector |
| Previous by Date: | Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, Charlie Cunningham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta thanshorterversions??, Lennart M |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, Charlie Cunningham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |