Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Antenna analysers in close proximity to BC station.

To: "160 reflector" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Antenna analysers in close proximity to BC station.
From: "Tom Boucher" <tom@telemetry.demon.co.uk>
Reply-to: Tom Boucher <tom@telemetry.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 21:21:29 -0000
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>

A ham friend asked me to design a matching network for his 160 metre end fed 
quarter wave, so I asked him to provide an impedance reading using his 
MFJ-259B. I would then use the Berkley site 
(http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/RF/projects/60GHz/matching/ImpMatch.html
 ) to provide the necessary values for an 'L' network, as I have done many 
times at my own station.

 

The readings he provided were total nonsense and quite erratic, so we concluded 
his MFJ-259B was dead. He assured me that he always does a static discharge 
before connecting the MFJ.

 

So I paid him a visit, taking along my Palstar Antenna analyser thing, which 
has always performed well at home, and what-do-you-know, the readings on that 
were also erratic, total nonsense and it behaved in a way I have never seen 
before. 

 

Than someone suggested the problem may be due to a 50Kw BC station on 909 KHz, 
situated less than 5 miles away, causing both antenna analysers to misbehave.

 

We ended up with a good old-fashioned link coupled parallel tuned circuit with 
the antenna tapped a few turns up from the ground end. This works fine but he 
is power limited due to arcing across the tuning capacitor. So we would ideally 
like to revert to the 'L' network plan, but how to use the antenna analyser in 
the presence of a high BC station field. Anyone any ideas?

 

73

Tom G3OLB
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>