I was trying to show I had sympathy for both sides of this discussion.
However to answer the question.
Since I have been challenged to do so.
Put the US Stations about 7075 or so. And run split....just like the US
Phone stations do.
Sure that will not totally eliminate the problem. But it is a
"possible" solution. Works for phone and has worked for phone for decades.
Dan/W4NTI
Bill Coleman wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Dan/W4NTI wrote:
>
>> And how far into the usual
>> CW band were you? It is indeed a two way street.
>> 40 is way too crowded.
>
> It should get better here by 2009, when 7000-7200 kHz is a worldwide
> allocation. That will give room for SSB to move up above 7100 kHz, and
> leave a place for RTTY and CW to split the remainder.
>
> It's kinda funny. One the one hand, you want the RTTY guys to move up
> out of the "usual" CW band, but also complained they were QRMing folks
> in the Region 1 SSB band. Where, exactly, would you have them go?
>
> I stayed out of the SSB portion. On 40m, I don't think I got above
> 7050. I did listen with the headphones the whole time, and I tried to
> keep my RTTY tones off of the usual CW watering holes of 7040 (where
> there's lots of crystal controlled rigs), 7030 and a couple of other
> frequencies.
>
> I agree about 30m. It's a great band. I hear a lot of CW there, not
> much RTTY.
>
> Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
> Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
> -- Wilbur Wright, 1901
>
>
>
> --No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 9/22/2006
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 9/22/2006
|