But California, Texas and Florida are not entire sections. Florida has 3,
Texas has Three and California has a bunch. These new requirements were not
written for these states. I'd say they were written more for a big state with
no huge population areas within 175 miles of each other such as ALaska where
now Fairbanks and Anchorage can both be part of the same club as AK or Montana
or Maine, etc.
N4UK
Larry Crim <k4ab@msn.com> wrote:
> > Anyone else care to comment? I think this change was written for the
> >benefit of California Texas and Florida. Not us. Or YCCC or FRC. I vote
> >stay the way we are. Of course, that's a view from an Alabama guy who
> >would need to form an Alabama Contest Club. Let's see... do we EVEN have 10
> >contesters in my section? -Larry K4AB
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: K9AY Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002
> 13:25 To: K4SB; secc@contesting.com Subject: Re: [SECC] Fw: Important changes
> to ARRL Club rules Ed
>
> Note that a club cannot do both175-mile and ARRL section.
>
> I am in favor of keeping the 175-mile definition. We would lose more
> good members from AL, SC and NC than we would gain from only
> including the Georgia section.
>
> Anyone else care to comment?
>
> 73, Gary
> K9AY
> ---------------------
> > This is great news! Not only will we finally! be able to pick up K4WI,
> > but N4PN and I'm sure a host of others.
> >
> > Since we seem to be able to do business via the internet, I move that we
> > immediately define ourselves as an ARRL section.
> >
> > 73
> > Ed
> >
> > K9AY wrote:
> > clubs now may define their club service area either
> > as a 175-mile radius circle or as an entire ARRL section.
>
>
>
> --
> SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
> Submissions: secc@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
>
>
--
SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions: secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
|