CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CWT Virus has spread to ARRL 10M - WPX next?

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>, Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CWT Virus has spread to ARRL 10M - WPX next?
From: ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: "ktfrog007@aol.com" <ktfrog007@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:56:17 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 I once wrote an complaining email to an Eastern European hot shot op who used 
cut numbers throughout a serial number contest. He replied with a detailed 
estimate of how much time he'd saved during the contest based on the number of 
QSOs he had and the frequency of cut numbers in the digits 0-9. It added up.

There wasn't much I could say to that, except I didn't like it.

73,
Ken, AB1J
    On Monday, December 16, 2024 at 07:18:36 PM UTC, Mike Fatchett W0MU 
<w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:   

 Not a fan of cut numbers in serial numbers.  I doubt any contest sponsor 
would attempt to ban the practice.  At the expense of your score you 
could choose not to log cut number contacts or continually ask for 
repeats until real numbers are sent or not.

W0Mu

On 12/16/2024 10:37 AM, jimk8mr--- via CQ-Contest wrote:
>  I don't think cut numbers could be outlawed - can you imagine how that would 
>be enforced?
> I think people overestimate the advantage of using cut serial numbers. I for 
> one won't start sending my exchange until I've logged the other guy's number, 
> which in nearly all cases takes as much time as if the number had been sent 
> uncut. And maybe longer to translate cut into uncut.
> Tough when back in Ohio W1NN and I enjoy using cut numbers in the VHF 
> contest, sending "EN NA" back and forth.
>
> 73  -  Jim   K8MR
>
>      On Monday, December 16, 2024 at 12:26:57 PM EST, jpescatore--- via 
>CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
>
>  A few months ago, after remotely opping OZ5W as part of a MM in the SAC CW 
>and running into cut numbers in variable serial numbers, I reached out to the 
>ARRL, WPX and CA QP test to recommend prohibiting cut numbers in non ST 
>exchange fields.
> Saw them quite a bit in the 10M ARRL this past weekend. I think CQ WPX CW is 
> next big one with serial number - still time to avoid EE5E send dit  dah dit  
> dah dit    dit   dit   dit  dit  towards the end of the weekend...
> The N1MM entry window parser will convert most of the letters if you type 
> what you hear, but I'd rather see rates increase by higher speed at both end 
> vs. shorter exchanges. Current rules vary about what happens if you do submit 
> log with alpha characters in serial number field.
> 73 John K3TN
>
>
>    
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
  
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>