I don't think cut numbers could be outlawed - can you imagine how that would
be enforced?
I think people overestimate the advantage of using cut serial numbers. I for
one won't start sending my exchange until I've logged the other guy's number,
which in nearly all cases takes as much time as if the number had been sent
uncut. And maybe longer to translate cut into uncut.
Tough when back in Ohio W1NN and I enjoy using cut numbers in the VHF contest,
sending "EN NA" back and forth.
73 - Jim K8MR
On Monday, December 16, 2024 at 12:26:57 PM EST, jpescatore--- via
CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
A few months ago, after remotely opping OZ5W as part of a MM in the SAC CW and
running into cut numbers in variable serial numbers, I reached out to the ARRL,
WPX and CA QP test to recommend prohibiting cut numbers in non ST exchange
fields.
Saw them quite a bit in the 10M ARRL this past weekend. I think CQ WPX CW is
next big one with serial number - still time to avoid EE5E send dit dah dit
dah dit dit dit dit dit towards the end of the weekend...
The N1MM entry window parser will convert most of the letters if you type what
you hear, but I'd rather see rates increase by higher speed at both end vs.
shorter exchanges. Current rules vary about what happens if you do submit log
with alpha characters in serial number field.
73 John K3TN
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|