I wonder about others busting the running station's call. Even at modest
speeds, I frequently get logged as K0MA, etc. I don't think the log
checkers penalize you if it's something close, at least not in most
contests. Maybe that's why high speed sending proves productive.
Perhaps the rules should require the calls to be logged correctly at
both ends.
Regardless of that, I can see absolutely no senses in calling CQ at high
speed late in a contest when few callers are coming back.
73,
Scott K9MA
On 12/3/2023 5:54 PM, dave pkministrywebs.com wrote:
One more thought regarding the possibility of more NIL penalties etc..
During the CQWW CW using N4IQ @W7WZ, I ran for 2.5 hours at 38-40 wpm non-stop and was
able to maintain accuracy. The higher the speed doesn’t always equal more
errors/penalties or NILs.
Increasing my speed equals a higher Q rate and that’s what it’s all about.
73 Dave WN4AFP
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: CQ-Contest<cq-contest-bounces+dave=pkministrywebs.com@contesting.com> on
behalf of Tom Hellem<tom.hellem@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 12:47:59 PM
To: Martin Sellschopp<m.sellschopp@gmail.com>
Cc:cq-contest@contesting.com <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cw speed
Martin-
I have often wondered the same thing. Here are my guesses as to what they
are thinking-
1. They assume that most ops, especially the casual ones, are using some
sort of call history program to auto-fill the exchange.
2. They assume that the majority of these "slower" ops are using the DX
clusters and Skimmers to provide the call signs and the frequencies.
3. They figure that for the small percentage of ops that are running
unassisted and who can't copy the speed they are sending at, the small
number of contacts they would gain by sending slower and capturing
those qso's would not be justified by the resulting reduction in their
rate over the course of an entire contest.
My guesses would probably not be applicable to a contest like WAE or ARRL
Sweepstakes where there is more information than just a zone
or a state to be copied in the exchange.
Your question is a good one.
Tom
K0SN
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 10:21 AM Martin Sellschopp<m.sellschopp@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
what is the advantage of sending cw at speeds which are most likely beyond
the capability of most cw operators ? Isn't a run station hoping for
replies also from the occasional contester ? Or do most operators now use
decoders able to take any speed ?
I helped myself with the callsigns from the cluster. In the cqwwdx contest
that's ok as the zone is known and hopefully I realise that he is replying
to me.
I can copy callsigns and exchange well up to 30 WPM and a bit more and set
my run speed to 22 WPM hoping for the quick guys to slow down a bit.
Martin
DK3UW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Scott K9MA
k9ma@sdellington.us
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|