CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Scoring Question

To: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Scoring Question
From: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:17:44 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Ron.  Lets use this example.  The W1 winner has 1,000,000 as a score and I 
am number 2 with 950,000.  W1 winner gets 1,000 points and I get 950 points.  
Lets say number 3 and 4 get 900,000 points and they are in W2 and W3.  The old 
way, would have me #2 after the first contest.  This new way, has 3 people at 
1,000 points and I have 950 points and I am now number 4.

Simple math.

Ed  N1UR

From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 7:48 PM
To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Scoring Question

Ed, I didn’t write, or was involved in writing, the rules, so I couldn’t 
possibly answer why they were written the way you describe.

I still don’t see your point.  Are you saying that the rules are set up to 
favor certain operators over others?  Or just that they’re poorly written... or 
at least not clear in their intent?

73
73, Ron W3WN

On Oct 24, 2023, at 4:37 PM, Edward Sawyer 
<EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>> wrote:
Ron, Then why not say there is one TL for W1 and W2 and W3.  Instead of calling 
3 TL from the area and then distorting the qualifying.

Have 3 people “win” every contest that are all actually competing for the same 
slots is illogical.  It is NOT what you just described.

Ed  N1UR

From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net<mailto:wn3vaw@verizon.net>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 3:37 PM
To: Edward Sawyer 
<EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>>
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Scoring Question

I’m not sure I understand the question.

There are three qualifying districts.  The top score in each qualifies.  
Simple.  Right?

So what’s the issue?

73, Ron W3WN

On Oct 24, 2023, at 12:14 PM, Edward Sawyer 
<EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com><mailto:EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>>
 wrote:
I wanted to put out the question to the group here to see if I am interpreting 
this correctly.

In the 1st qualification area of the US, there are 3 qualifying districts, W1, 
W2, W3.  If the highest score in W1 is 5 Million and the highest score in W2 is 
4 Million and the highest score in W3 is 3 Million, there will be 3 people that 
made those highest scores earning 1,000 points - assuming they are all HP 
Unassisted.  So instead of 1 winner of the area there are actually 3 winners of 
the area for every contest. And there are only 3 TL selected from the W1, W2, 
W3 area.  Even though there could have been numerous scores much higher than 
the W3 score in this example, the W3 winner will get the same credit as if they 
had the 5 Million score.

If the above is correct, this seems highly distorted.  You are guaranteeing 3 x 
1000 point winners in the contest vs it should only have 1 x 1000  points.

Please comment on whether this is in fact right.  Doesn't feel right....

Ed  N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com><mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>