Ed,
It's quite simple, just read it as it's written...
There will be 3 TL for NA #1 but it's not one from each area. It will be the 3
operators with the highest qualification scores.
So it can be 3 x W1, 3 x W2, 3 x W3, 2 from area 1 + 1 from area 2, and so
on... Any combination is possible and only one operator will get the 1000
points (or less) for each contest.
73's Dimitri F4DSK
Le 24 oct. 2023 à 23:01, à 23:01, Edward Sawyer
<edwards@advanced-conversion.com> a écrit:
>Ron, Then why not say there is one TL for W1 and W2 and W3. Instead of
>calling 3 TL from the area and then distorting the qualifying.
>
>Have 3 people “win” every contest that are all actually competing for
>the same slots is illogical. It is NOT what you just described.
>
>Ed N1UR
>
>From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 3:37 PM
>To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
>Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Scoring Question
>
>I’m not sure I understand the question.
>
>There are three qualifying districts. The top score in each qualifies.
> Simple. Right?
>
>So what’s the issue?
>
>73, Ron W3WN
>
>On Oct 24, 2023, at 12:14 PM, Edward Sawyer
><EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>>
>wrote:
>I wanted to put out the question to the group here to see if I am
>interpreting this correctly.
>
>In the 1st qualification area of the US, there are 3 qualifying
>districts, W1, W2, W3. If the highest score in W1 is 5 Million and the
>highest score in W2 is 4 Million and the highest score in W3 is 3
>Million, there will be 3 people that made those highest scores earning
>1,000 points - assuming they are all HP Unassisted. So instead of 1
>winner of the area there are actually 3 winners of the area for every
>contest. And there are only 3 TL selected from the W1, W2, W3 area.
>Even though there could have been numerous scores much higher than the
>W3 score in this example, the W3 winner will get the same credit as if
>they had the 5 Million score.
>
>If the above is correct, this seems highly distorted. You are
>guaranteeing 3 x 1000 point winners in the contest vs it should only
>have 1 x 1000 points.
>
>Please comment on whether this is in fact right. Doesn't feel
>right....
>
>Ed N1UR
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|