Let’s take it back to ground zero. No pre-fills at all, not even zones.
One of the laziest of all contests is CQWWCW. I suspect that a fellow could
run up a pretty decent score in that test in silent mode (don’t copy anything).
Just click the spots and accept the prefills from N1MM.
73, de Hans, KØHB
“Just a Boy and his Radio”™
________________________________
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.com@contesting.com> on
behalf of Richard DiDonna <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2023 11:35:25 AM
To: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Looking up on QRZ.com
Well how far “up” or back do we want to take this. How about N1MM or Wintest
that prefill 25 when you work a JA in the exchange field. Or how about a
prefill in NAQP that fills in Tom MD when you work K3AJ.
You could argue that they’re all guesses - which could be wrong.
QRZ data or ULS data is presumed to be correct.
I think looking up callsign data from the licensing authority during or after
the contest is a bridge too far.
73 Rich NN3W
> On Jun 3, 2023, at 12:26 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> But then, why are call history files or super check partial files not
> illegal? For that matter, cluster-derived spot information (even if only the
> callsign) isn't derived from on-the-air activity by the recipient. Seems to
> me like this is a bridge long crossed.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
>> On 6/3/2023 5:29 AM, Stanley Zawrotny wrote:
>> Looking up a callsign on QRZ can be considered assisted if the contest uses
>> any of the information provided as part of an exchange; name or state are
>> the most common, counties are used in state QSO parties.
>>
>> Stan, K4SBZ
>>
>> "Real radio bounces off the sky."
>>
>>>> On Jun 3, 2023, at 1:57 AM, Doug Bates<kv4zy.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Art,
>>> I don't claim to know all, but it strikes me as strange that a callsign
>>> lookup on any database could be against any rules. The nearest thing I can
>>> think of that may be anywhere near related in the rules of some contests is
>>> forbidding "Assisted" where contesters follow a cluster to find contacts
>>> that are currently reported as being on. Callsign lookup does not seem to
>>> me to be anywhere close to using a cluster to find contacts. But what do I
>>> know:)
>>> 73 & God Bless
>>> De KV4ZY
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 9:24 PM Art Boyars<artboyars@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On the N1MM reflector somebody asked about how to use the "QRZ" button
>>>> during the contest for calls that don't appear in the "check" window. I
>>>> guess he was talking about the SCP or CHF data files loaded into N1MM.
>>>>
>>>> A few people commented that looking it up on QRZ.com (or some other online
>>>> database??) during the contest was against the rules.
>>>>
>>>> I don't see any difference between using an online databas and using SCP
>>>> and CHF (except that SCP/CHF is faster).
>>>>
>>>> What do you wise people think?
>>>>
>>>> 73, art K3KU
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|