CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] PSE COPY

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PSE COPY
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:55:06 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 2/15/2021 6:38 PM, Dennis Moore wrote:
As far as leading with your call, aka KK9a de NJ6G NJ6G, in crowded conditions it helps to identify who exactly you're calling. I responded to a couple of CQs this past weekend only to have two stations come back to me. Neither of them realized the other was on freq. I had to then include the CQing station call sign to identify whose CQ I was responding to.

That's a fairly unusual situation (I ran into two running stations close enough to be confused fewer than six times in 28 hours and 1450 QSOs. When I did, if I was the running station I would QSY to avoid NILs. When I was S&P, unless I really needed the mult, I kept moving rather than calling, for the same reason. My calling macro is my call twice. When I did call in that situation, I sent his call followed by my usual macro.

That said, to avoid confusion as the running station, I begin and end my QSL message with his call. For example, KK9A TU KU6W CQ. But when I'm the S&P station, I respond to the running station's report with 599 and the QSO number.

Champion RTTY contester W0YK (P49W, KY0W) goes a step further. His QSL macro omits the other station's call, and he adds the "his call" when he thinks it is needed.

Good macros are critical. My resend number macro is the number twice; if conditions are rough, I'll hit it twice. My request for a repeat is NR? NR?, and I won't repeat it unless the other station is not responding.

73, Jim K9YC (KU6W in WPX)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>