CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results.

To: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results.
From: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 15:58:42 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I stand corrected on the software part. Thanks, Ria.

The only explanation possible then is 'bad attitude'. :^)

An even greater hobby!

Vince, VA3VF

On 2020-01-12 15:49, rjairam@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vince,

The problem with software versions has been largely mitigated as the old protocol with 1.x is now obsolete and incompatible with 2.x so upgrades were essentially forced. 1.9 had the old 75 bit protocol whereas 2.x has 77 bits when they added fox/hound mode and a few extra flags for things like rovers. RR73 being accepted as completion by auto sequence was done well before that. It was practice among some before. RR73 is a grid square nobody really goes to, so it works.

73
Ria,N2RJ
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>