CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results.

To: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results.
From: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 13:20:08 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Peter,

That's a valid concern, and the excerpt from the committee message you quoted should 'buy' all critics some time:

"For the FT mode it is not yet clear where the fault is..."

Read the preceding messages again, and you'll see that was not the issue.

The issue there, whether 'flowered' or not, was still FT-X is not hamradio, no skills, boring, unsophisticated users, etc.

As I said before, FT-X contesting is not likely to be my 'thing', but give it a chance, if you are concerned about contesting.

If you are still in 'mode wars' mood, give it a rest. Other 'experts' say the FT craze will die out in 3 years or so, let it happen on its own then. Natural death is one thing, 'premeditated murder' is another.

73 de Vince, VA3VF

On 2020-01-12 12:56, Peter Sundberg wrote:
But there is a major problem when the contest committee tell us that they had to waive the NIL penalty because otherwise a large number of stations would end up with a negative score.

Furthermore the committee states the following:

"In the legacy modes, the "fault" for a NIL is most always on the side that logged the QSO. For the FT mode it is not yet clear where the fault is, but in any case, the amount of NILs is abnormally high.  Going forward, FT contesting needs to better define how QSO partners can reliably communicate whether a QSO is complete and should be logged. The responsibility resides both
with contest participants and FT contest software developers."

Yes Vince, a contest is a contest and the goal is the same. But when the operator is unable to decide whether a QSO should be logged or not, to me it that's a clear indication that automation has gone too far. Especially when the committee says that the amount of NILs is abnormally high.

The operator is "in the back seat" and certainly NOT up front driving. Now that's where there's clearly room for criticizing the concept.

73
Peter SM2CEW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>