Joe,
Looking at that chart, it would appear that N1MM owns a huge portion
of the contesting software being used. I don't believe that chart is truly
representative of either N1MM or N3FJP. I know for my clubs, we changed
from N3FJP to N1MM+ because it was much easier to set up for multi-station
Q sorting and collation - took me 3/4 of an hour to get all four
stations set up
and ready to go for Field Day. Last year, I never did get N3FJP
networking to
work so have to do the sorting and collating by hand after.
Just my opinion, but I also found N1MM crew to be very easy to work with.
When we revamped the SC QSO Party, the John Bednarz was terrific getting
95% of what we wanted done done - and very quickly. The other 5% was
a pipe dream on our part and John pointed out why - very cooperative.
Tom, W1TEF
*THE BIG EVENT*
All New and Improved South Carolina QSO Party
September 19th, 2015 10 AM to 11 PM EDT.
Check it out - http://scqso.com/
On 6/28/2015 11:29 AM, Joe wrote:
Now the question is, as i see stuff about contesting, everywhere, web
pages, facebook, news items, etc.. especially today with Field Day,
And then after the WRTC contest was over most people used N1MM for
their logging.
Like that page shows for CQWW 40% used N1MM,
http://lu5dx.blogspot.de/2014/12/top-contest-loggers.html
Now the odd thing is,, then why in all the sources of contest
coverage, news, web pages, magazines, facebook etc. when someone is
running a contest, all I ever see is the N3FJP Program, now it's a
great program and I have nothing against it. but it seems really odd
that if 40% use N1MM and only 3% use N3FJP, why is it that N3FJP all
you ever see being used?
How Odd?
Joe WB9SBD
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|