CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs

To: "'Joe'" <nss@mwt.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs
From: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:05:27 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I don't really see widespread use of N1MM+ by the elite stations, at least
in the unscientific survey of a few dozen I observed in articles, etc, from
a few years ago. Writelog and Wintest are the two biggies when I factor in
both DXpeditions and large contest stations. Look at the big DXpedition
videos and it's rarely N1MM, which is a shame. Wintest seems to be the
favourite for whatever reason.
----------------------------------------------------
Regards,
Peter Dougherty, W2IRT
DXCC Card Checker/CQ-WAZ Checkpoint

www.facebook.com/W2IRT

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 11:29 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs

Now the question is, as i see stuff about contesting, everywhere, web pages,
facebook, news items, etc.. especially today with Field Day, And then after
the WRTC contest was over most people used N1MM for their logging.
Like that page shows for CQWW 40% used N1MM,
http://lu5dx.blogspot.de/2014/12/top-contest-loggers.html
Now the odd thing is,, then why in all the sources of contest coverage,
news, web pages, magazines, facebook etc. when someone is running a contest,
all I ever see is the N3FJP Program, now it's a great program and I have
nothing against it. but it seems really odd that if 40% use N1MM and only 3%
use N3FJP, why is it that N3FJP all you ever see being used?


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>