Subject: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional? |
---|---|
From: | vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham) |
Date: | Wed Nov 27 14:46:13 2002 |
N5NJ asked: >Maybe WB4VVF is to blame? (Any other OT's remember that callsign?) Okay, that's it - I _am_ an OT... not only do I remember 'VVF, but I also have an Accu-Keyer & an Accu-Memory somewhere in the basement of my Dad's house back in W7. If my recollection is correct, one could program a pause in a message of the Accu-Memory, so inserting a non-599 report was entirely possible, although it would force one to manually insert the RST every time. 73, VR2BrettGeezer (with apologies to N5OT) |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Short contest calls., VR2BrettGraham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, Bob Patten |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Keyers was: CQWW - are signal reports optional?, Mike Gilmer, N2MG |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, Tom Hammond NØSS |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |