| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional? |
|---|---|
| From: | k4ro@k4ro.net (K4RO Kirk Pickering) |
| Date: | Wed Nov 27 02:37:44 2002 |
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 05:06:02PM -0400, Mike Gilmer, N2MG wrote: > My guess is they figured that > > 1) you screwed up on the exchange That's what I thought happened when you called me. And it made me hesitate, which probably cancelled any time saved by not sending the 5NN "sync pulse." Just Another Data Point . . . -Kirk K4RO |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, KØHB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, Tom Osborne |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, Mike Gilmer, N2MG |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?, Dave Lawley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |