agreed... but not once was there mention of 6146's or 572b's
> From: k7fm@teleport.com
> To: gpatterson53@hotmail.com; amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 6146 via 572b's
> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:44:08 -0700
>
> "how did this thread get it's title?? "6146 via 572b's" what does it have
> to do with the discussion?
>
> Actually, the digression was normal and almost logical. The original
> question was regarding using a 10 watt 817 transceiver to drive an
> amplifier. Then, there was a discussion of different types of amplifiers
> that could be driven with 10 watts. This, of course, led to minor
> digressions such as super-cathode amplifiers. All normal for a diverse
> group of radio nuts.
>
> Further logical and normal digression led to a question of the 817 itself
> and how it caused fatigue to the listener.
>
> So, if you think this is a digression, remember, it could have digressed
> into whether using orange gum drop capacitors was fitting to replace a black
> beauty in that found 813 amplifier audio section, or one annual digression
> is whether the amplifier power supply for the 817 should use a neutral and
> dedicated common wiring in the old farmhouse.
>
> We should be thankful the thread did not digress into women's hats.
>
> 73, Colin K7FM
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|