Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 6146 via 572b's

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 6146 via 572b's
From: Gary Patterson <gpatterson53@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:20:08 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
how did this thread get it's title??   "6146 via 572b's"  what does it have to 
do with the discussion?

> From: rstealey@hotmail.com
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:35:23 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 6146 via 572b's
> 
> 
> >The folks who should be getting the award is the poor folks who have to 
> >struggle,
> > trying to pull these QRP sigs out of the mud.  
> 
> QRPers get no sympathy on this reflector!  
> But you are right Jim.  It's not the QRP guy, it's the OTHER guy who did all 
> the work.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                         
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
                                          
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>