TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OMNI6 PLUS Alignment procedure needed

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI6 PLUS Alignment procedure needed
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:23:11 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jerry's point is correct. The manual clearly states that the BFO alignment procedure should be repeated until no interaction is observed. Most often I find that the alignment is incorrect due to poorly calibrated test equipment or measurement procedure.

Additionally, I find that occasionally one may say "I'll skip the FSK alignment because I don't intend to operate FSK". WRONG....... there is interaction within these circuits.

73
Bob, K4TAX


I may be out in left field look the wrong way without ever seeing the
Omni circuits or manual. But there could be some weird interactions
around the BFO/carrier generator frequency settings.

As I recall, the CW BFO crystal is shifted in frequency for transmit. No
doubt it has separate trimmer capacitors for each frequency and probably
the manual says trimmer A sets receive and trimmer B sets transmit.
Trouble is that in one mode both trimmer A and trimmer B affect the
crystal and if you set one trimmer with both in the circuit, then set
the other mode, the first setting is now off and you go back and forth
for a while because of the excessive interaction. What's needed is to
set the trimmer that is alone for its mode, then change mode and set the
other. There might not be much interaction, but there could be some
capacitive coupling in the trimmer switch. To require a couple repeats.

Otherwise I can't think of any other place for there to be significant
interaction so long as the alignment proceeds from amplifier chain input
to output. If the loads aren't exactly the same when a tuned circuit is
switched between transmit and receive, it may be necessary to optimize
one and accept the lack of optimization on the other or to try for some
sort of compromise.

73, Jerry, K0CQ

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>