TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists
From: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:46:31 -0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Or wife came into the shack, dog barked, coffee spilled etc. etc.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee A Crocker" <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:36 AM
Subject: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists


>How many times have you heard one give a signal
report of 59 or such then followed by "can you repeat your name and QTH"? Now looking at that analogy of that report, the 5 = Perfectly readable, and 9 = Extremely strong signals. From that we must deduct that the transmitting station's audio was terrible or the receiving station operator was indeed deaf from using headphones for years.<

You may deduce that, what I would deduce is that the
reporting operator doesn't want to hurt the other
operator's feelings by giving him the 22 or 33 he
deserves.
bang bang... rifle shot....

73  W9OY

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>