| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] Headphone alarmists |
| From: | Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:36:59 -0800 (PST) |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
>How many times have you heard one give a signal report of 59 or such then followed by "can you repeat your name and QTH"? Now looking at that analogy of that report, the 5 = Perfectly readable, and 9 = Extremely strong signals. From that we must deduct that the transmitting station's audio was terrible or the receiving station operator was indeed deaf from using headphones for years.< You may deduce that, what I would deduce is that the reporting operator doesn't want to hurt the other operator's feelings by giving him the 22 or 33 he deserves. bang bang... rifle shot.... 73 W9OY |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] wanted: Herc II, Jim W0CML |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists, Dave Edwards |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists, cnagel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists, Dave Edwards |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |