TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists
From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:08:51 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
How many times have you heard one give a signal report of 59 or such then followed by "can you repeat your name and QTH"? Now looking at that analogy of that report, the 5 = Perfectly readable, and 9 = Extremely strong signals. From that we must deduct that the transmitting station's audio was terrible or the receiving station operator was indeed deaf from using headphones for years.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee A Crocker" <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 5:39 AM
Subject: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists


Be very careful,  Its my understanding that even
writing about headphones can cause a hearing loss

HUH?   WHAT?  I CAN'T HEAR U

Seems to me it isn't the headphones that are the
problem it's the crankin up the friggin volume thats
the problem

73  W9OY
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>