I am not sure where the prohibition against asking to be spotted came from.
Perhaps it is time to remove that from the rules? Or go even one step more
and allow self-spotting.
We sure noticed the lack of rate until after a spot here at PJ4Q this
weekend.
Randy, K5ZD
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Peter Dougherty (W2IRT)
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 1:15 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required?
>
> As a stateside op who likes to run I'm often frustrated by the lack of
> spots generated by DX stations for guys on this side. I don't like the
> rule about being unable to ask to be spotted but I'll never violate it.
> What I *might* say to a caller, if I'm CQing to generally dead air, is
> "thanks for the call, it was gettin' pretty lonely here." Once in a very
> long while someone will give me a sympathy spot. And if not, I'll just
> try to find a new fishing hole. If it were permitted to ask for spots I
> bet the average score amongst mid-sized stations would go up by a million
> or two per contest due to longer runs.
>
> When it comes to me spotting I have the "spot all S&P QSOs" feature
> turned on in N1MM. This spots any QSO that didn't appear in my bandmap
> that I enter manually. I doesn't re-spot posted calls, however. I wish
> that feature was set to on by default or would stay on once engaged but
> that's a policy decision by Tom and his crew.
>
> I try to remember to spot my fellow FRCers when I run across them, and
> I'm extremely grateful when one spots me in return, but at the end of the
> day, it seems that EU and Caribbean stations will be spotted far more
> than US stations. In my own case, I was spotted 15 times during CQWW but
> a quick search of a few of the Caribbean powerhouses with well over 100
> spots. It's no wonder they never run out of callers!
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> GO FRC!
> Peter, W2IRT
>
> www.facebook.com/W2IRT
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Edward Sawyer
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 2:23 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required?
>
> Taking a look at my spots this morning. It is very surprisng when you
> are spotted and when you are not spotted according to DX Summit. Are
> there other locations where spots exist on SSB that is not shown here? I
> had a number of runs during the contest and was never spotted according
> to DX Summit. A nice JA run on 15M and very loud and fast 20M run to EU
> on Sunday afternoon, neither of these ever appear despite producing
> probably 400+ Qs in the log over a few hours.
>
> With CW, the RBN system is an effiient harvester of signals that
> basically instantly populates the band map with spots.
> There is no such system on SSB.
>
> The major contests call asking to be spotted a violation. Every contest,
> I either hear or am asked a few times regardless. I am very fine with
> this being considered unsportsmanlike. However, with the increasing
> number of contesters having a contest experience that is nothing more
> than clicking on spots, its becoming equally unfair for stations to be
> spotted in very disproportionate frequencies.
>
> I put this question to the contest sponsors and the assisted and multi-op
> contest community: What is your responsibilty to make spots of stations?
> Are you just a harvester? Or do you contribute to the process? It would
> seem to be in everyone's interest that doesn't "spin the dial" much, or
> at all, anymore to make sure that the interaction is bi-lateral.
>
> Should a minimum spotting requirement be added? We have a minimum ID
> requirement in CQ major contests? How about a minimum spotting
> submission requirement for those using the system?
>
> I personally like the unassisted experience. But being a "ghost"
> in the bandmap world doesn't help anyone in contesting anymore.
>
> 73
>
> Ed N1UR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|