Then there is "the buddy" who either sits at your elbow and spots you or
just listens often and spots you often. I know of a case of each where the
spots were disproportionate to others in the area.
I choose CLASSIC and enjoy, Charly
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
wrote:
> Taking a look at my spots this morning. It is very surprisng
> when you are spotted and when you are not spotted according
> to DX Summit. Are there other locations where spots exist on
> SSB that is not shown here? I had a number of runs during the
> contest and was never spotted according to DX Summit. A nice
> JA run on 15M and very loud and fast 20M run to EU on Sunday
> afternoon, neither of these ever appear despite producing
> probably 400+ Qs in the log over a few hours.
>
> With CW, the RBN system is an effiient harvester of signals
> that basically instantly populates the band map with spots.
> There is no such system on SSB.
>
> The major contests call asking to be spotted a violation. Every contest,
> I either hear or am asked a few times regardless. I am very fine
> with this being considered unsportsmanlike. However, with the
> increasing number of contesters having a contest experience that
> is nothing more than clicking on spots, its becoming
> equally unfair for stations to be spotted in very disproportionate
> frequencies.
>
> I put this question to the contest sponsors and the assisted and
> multi-op contest community: What is your responsibilty to make
> spots of stations? Are you just a harvester? Or do you contribute
> to the process? It would seem to be in everyone's interest that
> doesn't "spin the dial" much, or at all, anymore to make sure that the
> interaction is bi-lateral.
>
> Should a minimum spotting requirement be added? We have a minimum
> ID requirement in CQ major contests? How about a minimum
> spotting submission requirement for those using the system?
>
> I personally like the unassisted experience. But being a "ghost"
> in the bandmap world doesn't help anyone in contesting anymore.
>
> 73
>
> Ed N1UR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
Charly, HS0ZCW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|