| To: | Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>, Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required? |
| From: | RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net> |
| Reply-to: | RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:23:56 +0000 (UTC) |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 9:28 AM, Maarten van Rossum > <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you send your call in CW you get a spot right away. It is virtually the > same as self spotting. So, why not allow self spotting for SSB? > What about sending a CW ID or CQ periodically in addition to a voice CQ during phone contests? Then CW Skimmer would spot you (the default band limits in Skimmer might need modifying). Tor N4OGW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] When is it OK to refuse to give out a QSO?, Bill Mader |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required?, Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\) |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required?, Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required?, Martin Pelt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |