VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Question to the group

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Question to the group
From: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 20:16:54 -0700
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
The ARRL VHF contests have a schizophrenic approach towards microwave activity. 
With the one hand, they seem to want to encourage microwave activity by 
awarding higher QSO points for the higher bands. With the other hand, they 
discourage microwave activity by promoting the limited classes, creating new 
three band classes and FM only classes. One would think that you can’t have it 
both ways, but apparently you can.

Due to the higher points given to microwave QSOes, our current ARRL VHF 
contests are de facto microwave contests unless you enter the limited classes, 
at least when there is no sporadic E. 

But it is more than just the points question. It does little good to have more 
points for QSOes if there is no one to work on those bands. And when the 
limited classes are an option at little additional expense, that discourages 
microwave activity even further. And when the big multi stations drop 
microwaves that reduces incentive even further. 

The real question to ask is what is the goal to be accomplished with the 
additional points for microwave QSOes? If it is to encourage microwave 
activity, then the limited classes undermine this. If it is to reward the 
difficulty in making microwave QSOes, then that undermines activity on the 
lower bands by removing activity from them for the duration of the microwave 
QSO.

Other questions worth asking are: Does it make sense to include microwave QSOes 
at all in a VHF contest like the June contest when there is a lot of sporadic E 
and activity on 6M? Does it make sense to simultaneously encourage microwave 
activity by awarding additional points for it and discourage it by implementing 
the various limited classes?

I find it interesting how these discussions always end up about geography and 
level playing fields, even though those topics are not in the original question 
at all. - Duffey KK6MC

--
KK6MC
James Duffey
Cedar Crest NM





_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>