VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating

To: VHF Contesting Reflector <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>, Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating
From: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 07:30:21 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 2/12/14, Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net> wrote:
 
"You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din!  I, for one, am not interested in 
being belted *or* flayed.  But yes, that would surely be helpful if for no 
other reason than to make sure there is more than one point of view 
represented."

Based on my experiences of trying to do just that for more than 10 years now on 
places like eHam is that you will find more than likely to be simply "unheard" 
than be criticized for posting information about what we do on the "ultra 
highs". But yes, please do chime in, it gets pretty lonely out there trying to 
offer information to the masses about what we do on these bands.

There was a recent eHam.net article (“222 MHz the missing Band - Still 
Missing”) posted by W4KYR asking why after 10 years after someone had posted 
that same question in a previous article that there are still no all band, all 
mode, radios with 222 in them from I, K, Y, or even anyone else. The responses 
were interesting. Several of us pointed out that there are a couple readily 
available off the shelf transverter options to get going on 222 SSB/CW. And I 
further pointed out that for fixed station uses where portability isn't 
important transverters are a better way to go anyhow. That was basically the 
exact same comment I made 10 years previously to the article cited by this most 
recent one.

Then there were numerous comments that conflated FM only gear availability with 
the topic of the article that was specifically about SSB/CW capability. But 
then also many of the posters to that article were so completely fixated on the 
notion that only legitimate way to get on on a band is to buy it in a box from 
I, K, or Y they simply couldn't (refused to??) comprehend that there are others 
ways to get onto 222. There's this really peculiar perception out there that if 
it isn't available from I, K, or Y, then it doesn't exist. And that it won't 
exist until it can be bought from I, K, or Y.. This widely held belief out 
there in amateur radio land has baffled me almost more than the reality of 
there being 10's of thousands of radios with 6m, 2m, and 70cm in them already 
out there in people's hands that never get used on those bands and modes.

So I will continue assert that it is not equipment availability, or 
availability of information about what we do that is the limiting factor for 
why people don't get on these bands and modes we do, it is something else.

Duane
N9DG


 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>