VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF En Vogue; issues and

To: jarritt@vt.edu, vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF En Vogue; issues and
From: Rhinosix <rhinosix@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:26:10 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
So as I see the problem with VHF/UHF is not enough activity to generate popular interest. I remember back a few solar cycles when the Brits could only listen on 6 meters we had cross band QSOs using 10 meters as a coordination freq and communication channel. True ARRL doesn't give awards for cross band awards. Maybe CQ magazine and others would. I'm thinking cross band 6 meters to 4 meters and 4 meters to 2 meters. Icom has a mobile to DC to daylight rig that receives 4 meters maybe others do too. Or was that just for the region 1 market. So how about a 4 meter SDR dongle as a stand alone receiver?
It would make a good ARRL home brew challenge project.
Talk it up.
Jerry,  W2JCN




-----Original Message-----
From: Joshua M. Arritt <jarritt@vt.edu>
To: vhfcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Mon, Feb 10, 2014 10:37 am
Subject: [VHFcontesting] VHF En Vogue; issues and

On 2/9/2014 5:49 PM, Duane - N9DG wrote:
This lack of curiosity to try things like VHF weak signal strikes me
as a side effect of amateur radio having been promoted for a few decades now as being a utilitarian communications "ends" vs. being it a lifelong continuing journey focused on propagation challenges and technology..

Duane
N9DG

We have at this moment several counts against V activity that have been
outlined:

P1.) DC-Daylight includes HF, which at the moment (good solar activity)
provides the culturally-demanded "instant gratification" expected of
"technology" in the modern era.
P2.) Poor paper-chaser bait (VUCC as stepchild syndrome).
P3.) Dearth of good compelling and well-delivered
advertising/articles/published works which highlight the _intrinsic_
rewards of riding V/U propagation.
P4.) "Poor economy" wag = declined income = more labor hours to make
bills = far fewer play dollars/hours (keeping me off the air more often
than not since 2010!!).

... I'll add a few:
P5.) Ubiquitous broadband internet as Entertainment Delivery platform is eroding hours from all other activities among a swath of demographics --
a trend which may level off as the on-demand shine dulls a bit (see P1).
P6.) Local QRN condx (? maybe a minor factor, but I argue SNR on V/U is
critical to enjoyment) increasing as little consumer noisemakers become
re-produce like so many hares.




Suggestions**( I only ask we keep it positive/additive for 2 days;
please try to add to this list _constructively_ -- THEN when we've
collected all the dumb ideas, us curmudgeon detractors, self-included,
can RIP it apart with long negative diatribes on why none of it will
work at all! ;)  ):


***** For the "NowGeneration" op candidates, pull V/U operations down to
low-common-denominator pop culture -- easier than ever:

S1.) Pitch new non-traditional awards -- things like an
Instagram/Facebook/etc photo contest of Rover/Hilltop Portable set-up;
Play the new social junkfood trends to grab the younger audience
attention.  Possibilities here are wide and far!




****SDR is the future -- and for those of us /already/ in the future
(like _you_), it's the present.....  and mobile-pocket SDR is close on
the horizon:

S2.) Make monitoring portable/remote-able.  Push development of SDR V/U
performance in small, efficient packages (already suggested).

S3.) Push SDR application development for mobile device
interface/operation from remote and alerting of signal patterns
consistent with "activity", "propagation", maybe an "auto-beacon-seek"
or other indicators that help (nigh, they just do the work) find Qs on V/U.

S4.) Push hilltop remote-base installation of the above mentioned rigs
in terrain-challenged areas.


**** "Community grass-roots organizing" might move the S-meter needle a
bit (hihi... but seriously):

S5.) Strategically encourage state QSO party sponsors (again) to include
V/U, as just bands; as band-point-mults (Like June's point scheme);  as
full category/categories (QRP, Multi-Op, Limited/Unlimited,
whatever)...  perhaps best to start that in the populated states where
V/U has activity, and are sched in times of year where propagation
enhancements are likely to make a "model" for other {ST}QP organizers to
gaze upon.   Realizing this has been done w/ limited success, but times
are changing....  ask: do these events see suffering/stagnating
participation numbers in the modern era of digital distraction too?

S6.) For the next generation V/U op: V/U Rover-Super-Hero/Heroine/Team
comic book series?  Think STEM.  How can V/U operations mesh with
educational initiatives at the /LOCAL/ level?


**** Passive-aggressive:

S8.) Wait for the sun to quiet down.  ;)


More...?




  73,
  - Josh / KF4YLM









_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting



_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>