VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Decline of VHF activity

To: Gregg Seidl <k9kl@centurytel.net>, Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Decline of VHF activity
From: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:49:10 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
In line..
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 2/9/14, Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net> wrote:

"My biggest thrill in radio came the other summer when I worked the  east coast 
and up into Ontario on 2 SSB.  I was especially excited  since I only have 100 
W and an ancient Cushcraft 10 el beam on an equally ancient TV rotator.  I've 
looked forward to that one day per summer that we get conditions like that 
again."

This is the same hook that got me back in the early to mid 80's. I can think of 
nothing that can be done below 6M that is as exciting to me as some truly long 
haul terrestrial 2M or up Qs, even 6M gets "too HF like" for my tastes from 
time to time... Even before I got my Novice I had already set my sights on 
50MHz and up as my operating focus. I also remember encountering folks back 
then who were new to me a year or so after I got started on 2M SSB/CW who were 
in reality grizzled veterans of 25 or more years of doing weak signal work 
already. I'm now one of them. And like them I just don't get on as much as I 
used to, or as much as I would like to for a variety of reasons, part of which 
is a certain amount of "been there, done that". That tendency is a completely 
natural flow of things. But what seems to be very different for the last 20 or 
so years is that there aren't nearly as many newbies any given week or month 
trying it out like there was circa
 1984 when I was the green newbie. There are certainly some, but not nearly as 
many as in years past. And this is the case despite all of the readily 
available economically priced gear that is already in the hands of people, and 
more licensees than ever before..


"Somehow, weak signal folks have to bottle that ... especially since I get the 
sense that few of the less-involved hams in my club don't really believe that's 
possible."

I'm not even sure it is a matter of them not believing that it is possible, I 
think a good many simply have no comprehension at all of what doing that kind 
of a signal path on a VHF or UHF band actually represents, or even care. I see 
evidence of that all the time whenever there is some local enhancement on 2M 
and up and you start hear repeaters from 100 or so miles away. The few on the 
FM repeaters who even notice or comment on those "openings" have no clue that 
those 100 ish mile paths are daily normal for us weak signal ops, and is in 
fact nothing to get truly excited about at all.


"And yes, time is a huge constraint.  More emphasis on "activity nights" (or 
nets) that folks could plan for would probably be a good idea."

Activity nights are fine and good, but the interest of many new ops, and many 
not so new ops who already own radios capable of this kind of activity just 
isn't there. The vast majority just don't have the curiosity or motivation to 
even try. That I think is the underlying problem, and I really wish I had an 
idea for how to change that. And I don't think simple promotion, or better 
operating aids, or rule adjustments will change it. They have all been tried 
already. 

This lack of curiosity to try things like VHF weak signal strikes me as a side 
effect of amateur radio having been promoted for a few decades now as being a 
utilitarian communications "ends" vs. being it a lifelong continuing journey 
focused on propagation challenges and technology..

Duane
N9DG
 
 -- 
" Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!"

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>