VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] A reasonable approach to the grid circlingproblem...

To: w2ev@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] A reasonable approach to the grid circlingproblem....
From: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:16:52 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>

I don't think elimiating grid reactivation would do much.  For absolute maximum 
score, given an unlimited amount of time, that would help, but a huge score 
could still be racked up by coordinated movement that didn't reactivate grids. 



Steve 

K4GUN/R 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ev Tupis" <w2ev@yahoo.com> 
To: VHFcontesting@contesting.com 
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 6:18:26 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] A reasonable approach to the grid 
circlingproblem.... 

> P.S.  I have been informed that the Philladelphia lawyers 
> cannot come up with a definition of grid circling that 
> does not include pack roving.....indeed many do not see 
> the difference at all. 
> If that be true, then, sadly, we must also prohibit pack 
> roving to the lower two classes.   

Your informant is incorrect. :) 

There are two possible strategies to put this to bed: 
1. Align Rover Class scoring methods to that of other classes 
2. Further tweak them to eliminate the ability to re-activate a previously 
activated grid (can't circle) 

Ev, W2EV 




       
_______________________________________________ 
VHFcontesting mailing list 
VHFcontesting@contesting.com 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>