On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:44:01PM -0400, Chet, N8RA wrote:
> But I agree with your point on the ethics of contesting. Some public
> discussion of the issues and fine points helps not only the specific
> instance but a wider audience realize and understand them. Last contest
> there was mention of the misuse of scheduling and chat networks during the
> contest by Single Ops.
>
> Toward better, cleaner, competition,
Yes.
Sunlight is a good thing.
Recently on another list there has been a discussion of
ethics and rules and such. One of the posts was from K5ZD
who had just given the contest ethics talk at the Contest University.
He said:
In my contesting ethics talk at Contest University, I
suggested two points to keep in mind when considering pushing
the envelope. Would you be ok with what you are doing if it
was made public? Are you willing to live with the long term
impact on your reputation if there is even an appearance of
misconduct?
And W9SZ followed up with:
There's a third questions I thought of. It could be very
telltale, actually. The question is "How do you feel about
others doing the same thing?"
Food for thought.
I have been thinking about contest rules and cheating and such
and I found a posting on the Internet that I found interesting
in the way that it parallels the fact that we do not have
judges in our shacks during a contest it has to do with playing
chess over the Internet or via email or mail.
http://www.playchess.de/articles/1
--
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|