As far as I'm concerned, these guys did nothing
unsportsmanlike. They took advantage of the rules as
they are written.
The ARRL needs to effectively address the grid
circling matter in a fair way, but soon.
K7CW
--- "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:51:07AM -0400,
> N6MU1@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > The only way midwest or west coast rovers can be
> competitive nationally
> > is to join forces. WTX is the best area of the
> country where multiple
> > convergences are readily available close to major
> highways. I don't
> > understand the objection to grid circling when
> there is literally no
> > one else to work. Also, where I go to operate is
> solely my choice.
>
> Here is why grid circling sucks.
>
> In order to effectively grid circle, multiple rover
> stations must be
> operating in a highly coordinated manner. It does
> not happen by accident.
> The complexity and coordination of the scheduling
> involved probably exceeds
> the level of planning most multi-operator station
> put into scheduling their
> operators. The point is, it is obvious that
> grid-cirlcing rovers are really
> operating ONE contest operation with MULTIPLE
> stations and callsigns. When
> two, three, or four rovers coordinate in the way
> that you have recently
> been doing, it is not two, three, or four separate
> contest operations - it
> is one planned and executed operation that involves
> two, three, or four
> callsigns, mostly just making QSOs with itself.
>
> Just as single operator contest efforts are not made
> to compete with
> multioperator contest efforts, single-station
> contest efforts should not
> be expected to compete against multi-station contest
> efforts, and nobody
> should be competing against a contest effort that
> can manufacture an
> arbitrary number of QSOs with itself.
>
> > This "idiot" is proud to be part of the group that
> raised the roving
> > bar this year. If you think designing and building
> multiple reliable
> > and portable ten-band rover stations including
> antennas isn't
> > technically challenging, try it.
>
> Just because some technical achievement is
> challenging, does not mean that
> your use of that technical achievement demonstrates
> good sportsmanship.
>
> --
> Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
> kenharker@kenharker.com
> http://www.kenharker.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|