VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: 902 vs 903

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: 902 vs 903
From: Lee Scott - AA1YN <aa1yn@aa1yn.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 14:21:27 -0400
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
At 11:39 AM 9/2/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Personally, I see advantages to using 145 over 144 for the IF, especially at stations where there are more than one transverter using 2 meters for an IF. I would think you would want the option of using either 902 or 903 simply by changing the IF rig frequency rather than having to change a crystal in the transverter.
Danny NG9R

I agree - if you have an IF transceiver for each transverter, it would help to have each one on a separate frequency but personally, I can't afford an FT-817 for each of my 4 transverters with a 2m IF.


Not so wealthy here :-(


Lee Scott - AA1YN Home of the VHF & Up Register http://www.aa1yn.com/vhf Hooksett, NH FN43gc52


_______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>