To: | Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org> |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Re: 902 vs 903 |
From: | dpease@adams.net |
Date: | Thu, 02 Sep 2004 11:39:00 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Personally, I see advantages to using 145 over 144 for the IF, especially at
stations where there are more than one transverter using 2 meters for an IF.
I would think you would want the option of using either 902 or 903 simply by
changing the IF rig frequency rather than having to change a crystal in the
transverter. Danny NG9R Zack Widup writes: On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Lee Scott - AA1YN wrote: Danny Pease dpease@adams.net ....................................................... Sent using Adams WebMail --- http://webmail.adams.net Adams NetWorks -- Keeping you well-connected worldwide! _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Where are the Radiosports fans? [was: Rovingand Hamfests], Ev Tupis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: 902 vs 903, Lee Scott - AA1YN |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs 903, Zack Widup |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: 902 vs 903, Lee Scott - AA1YN |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |