VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs 903

To: "VHF Contesting" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs 903
From: Lee Scott - AA1YN <aa1yn@aa1yn.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 20:20:16 -0400
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
At 10:54 PM 9/1/2004 +0000, John Wilcox / NS1Z wrote:
I like to build and am looking at making 90? my next kit. Question is, there
are two versions: one for 902 and one for 903. I am not too interested in
building one that I can't use. Why the two versions?


Hi John,

I've been through the dilemma and started with a 902. The activity in the eastern US is on 903MHz but in the west, it is on 902. There has been a lot of talk (no action) on switching the weak signal calling freq to 902 but it hasn't happened yet. The reason I purchased a 902 rig was that I was using a DSP-10 for the IF which made everything transparent. When my DSP went south a year ago, I bought an FT817 which made 903 on a 902 rig inconvenient as I needed to have the IF at 145MHZ for 903 and 144MHz for 1296.

The only difference between the two rigs is a crystal so if you pick up a 903 and later on down the road find you need 902, you just re-crystal the rig. That is what I did to get a 903 rig but I saved the crystal for 902.




Lee Scott - AA1YN Home of the VHF & Up Register http://www.aa1yn.com/vhf Hooksett, NH FN43gc52


_______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>