The prose is fine. I am not complaining about what is there. I am complaining
about what is missing. And yes I know the author has little control over this,
which is why I aimed my complaints at the ARRL & QST.
QST said they were going to take away the line scores. I totally disagree with
this, but it is now a done deal. But, they did not warn us (or maybe I missed
it) that they were going to take away the Regional Boxes. Fow many years I
complained about only having top ten boxes. When they finally added regional
boxes I was very happy.
Now this is a giant step backwards.
Tim - NU6S
To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
--- On Mon 11/25, Ed Kucharski wrote:From: Ed Kucharski [mailto:
k3dne@adelphia.net]To: vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu, pvrc@mailman.qth.net,
VHFcontesting@contesting.comDate: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:04:13 -0500Subject:
[VHFcontesting] June VHF and UHF contests QST results availableARRL has posted
the QST results for the June VHF QSO Party and UHF Contest
on the ARRL Members Only webpage at: http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/
These write-ups are apparently the new ones to appear in QST without line
scores. I'm a little disappointed - the June event only has 3 pages
dedicated to it with 4 pics, the top 10 scoring box for each category and a
write-up that puts more focus on regional competition. I sure hope the web
write-up with line scores is more comprehensive.
73,
Ed K3DNE
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
|