To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] High power 2:1 transformer was Re: 16om vertical and the number of radials |
From: | Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:38:36 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
A somewhat related question - as the R component at the feedpoint of my
inverted L goes down toward 25 ohms, I've begun wondering if I should do
some matching at the feedpoint, rather than using my tuner in the shack,
even though feedline losses at 160 are relatively low. Can someone
point me toward a good way to do a 2:1 downward transformation? I
already have a common mode choke at the feedpoint.
73, Pete N4ZR Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network web server at<https://reversebeacon.net>. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. On 12/2/2022 2:32 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: On 12/2/2022 6:25 AM, Ignacy Misztal wrote:On the other hand, some really loud stations n 160m, say 5-10 db above thecrowd, use a massive amount of radials. This is for inland stations, far away from salt water.I think this describes my station. I do have a massive amount of radials, and I am constantly told how strong my signal is.As to cause and effect: I think not. The real secret sauce at N6RK is the high conductivity ground, although the radials obviously don't hurt. I am on the Sacramento river delta. We have 100% clay going down 40 feet. Rick N6RKIs there any discrepancy between modeling and real life performance with the number of radials? Does adding radials beyond 32 help much? Any real stories?The precise number of radials that is optimum depends on ground conductivity. N6LF's excellent work only strictly applies to HISground. As for my ground, I suspect I could get away with only 8 or 16 radials. YMMV.Ignacy NO9E ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials, Pete Smith N4ZR |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] High power 2:1 transformer was Re: 16om vertical and the number of radials, marsh |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 16om vertical and the number of radials, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] High power 2:1 transformer was Re: 16om vertical and the number of radials, marsh |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |