| To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ? |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:44:27 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On 10/12/2021 5:59 PM, Gene Smar via TowerTalk wrote: In that way even the non-selected antennas/coax lines are protected. Protectors are for the RADIO, not the coax. And they can't do that at the tower. What you cite as "commercial practice" is the only right way to do it. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ?, Gene Smar via TowerTalk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ?, Gene Smar via TowerTalk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ?, Gene Smar via TowerTalk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF Surge Suppressor at Base of Tower or Shack SPG or Both ?, Gene Smar via TowerTalk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |