To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Solid 160 radial plates? |
From: | David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:37:10 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I totally agree. I can't think of a single valid reason why a plate is even a little bit better than simply a tie point at the base. I've often wondered why folks don't simply use the addon bus bars for electrical panels that you can buy at any Lowes or Home Depot. They are relatively inexpensive, have screw connections, and make a fine non-corroding contact. They can be daisy chained together for as many radials as you have the ambition to put down. And if somebody wants to be a purist about it, four of them arrayed in a square around the base makes way more sense than a plate. Dave AB7E On 8/27/2018 2:47 PM, Don Havlicek wrote: A radial "plate" is highly overrated. Simply tie all the radials together at the base of the vertical. See the photo on my QRZ.COM page. 73 Don N8DE Sent from my Verizon Motorola Smartphone On Aug 27, 2018 5:33 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:I have a very old 10.5' aluminum satellite dish out in the woods. I keep thinking I should put this at the base of one of my 160m verticals, right on the edge of the woods where the trees meet the lawn. Maybe I could get my wife to plant some ivy on it to eventually cover it all up camo-style. Would it make any difference? ?? Mike VE9AA _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Fwd: Solid 160 Radial Plates, Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Solid 160 radial plates?, Kirk Kleinschmidt via TowerTalk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Solid 160 radial plates?, Don Havlicek |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Solid 160 radial plates?, Kirk Kleinschmidt via TowerTalk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |