I don't think you are making a contact over the Internet.
You are getting access to a station via the Internet but the contact is made
via a transceiver and antenna. Everything about the QSO is the same as if
you were physically sitting at the remote operating position.
As Tim Duffy points out, these stations can be considered to be "extreme"
and be in a different category but that is simply a choice of the rules
people. If a human was physically sitting in the remote shack and made the
same number of contacts would the station be placed in an "extreme"
category?
I can't see how a human on site would necessarily do better or worse than
someone sitting 5,000 miles away but using exactly the same operating
techniques via a broadband connection.
If I had a remote station and had a keyer with a 10,000 foot cord running to
the radio and a 10,000 foot cord running back to a speaker would I be
violating a rule (other than common sense)?
----------------- Wes Attaway (N5WA) -------------------
1138 Waters Edge Circle, Shreveport, LA 71106
318-797-4972 (Office) - 318-393-3289 (Cell)
Computer Consulting and Forensics
-------------- EnCase Certified Examiner ---------------
-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Richard Solomon
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 8:46 PM
To: Tower Talk
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio
>From what I read on the site, you get a K-3 and some interface
software. This leads me to believe you are operating the station
via the Internet.
If true, then I really don't think any Q's derived from this scheme
will count for any ARRL DX Award and probably not for most
contests.
But, one can dream ...
73, Dick, W1KSZ
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:26 PM, <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
> That is a good question for an attorney. There are a lot of rent-a-qth
and
> personally I do not see anything illegal about renting a home with a ham
> station. I rented my Iguanavilla - Aruba to visiting hams.
>
> John KK9A / P40A
>
> To:towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject:Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio
> From:K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
> Date:Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:21:59 -0400
> List-post:<towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
>
>
> Isn't it against the rules to make money or receive reimbursement for the
> use of an Amateur Radio station?
> 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>
> To:towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject:[TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio
> From:K7LXC@aol.com
> Date:Fri, 2 Aug 2013 12:39:10 -0400 (EDT)
> List-post:<towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
>
> Greetings, TowerTalkians --
>
> I'm not sure how I missed it but here is a new service for hams. It's
> a time-share of ham radio stations of some clout. Check it out at
> http://www.remotehamradio.com/.
>
> Some impressive stations are available for your use.
>
> Cheers,
> Steve K7LXC
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|