Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: Revocation ofBuilding Pe

To: "R. Kevin Stover" <rkstover@mchsi.com>, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: Revocation ofBuilding Permit?
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:36:58 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
At 09:23 AM 7/17/2004, R. Kevin Stover wrote:
I assume the city is using this 19" width requirement as a deterrent to putting anything up. They couldn't just come out and ban towers per se but can and apparently do make it difficult to put anything up (self supporting) that will take any appreciable load. The 64' Heights tower I'm planning is 30" per side at the base and tapers to 14" at the top.


On the other hand, couldn't it be that the city is simply ignorant of the dimensions of self-supporting towers, and based its spec on Rohn 45?


73, Pete N4ZR
The World HF Contest Station Database
was updated on June 5, 2004
2728 contest stations at
www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>